This is the wrong answer again, it did not follow the structure I gave above and did not answer all the questions.
Also, most paragraphs are copied word for word from google search and the previous case study provided although I informed the writer, it was the wrong answer and structure.

I have pointed out all the feedback below, submission is due today, so I will have to redo all the work. 

Please see below the reason I am requesting a refund for this work.

Structure and answer to the case study, the case study requires answering the following questions by dividing the essay into 5 sections (The essay is not structured accordingly).
1. hypothesis on the client\'s presenting issue according to both theories a) CBT - discuss the theory in relation to the client issue B) EFT - discuss the theory in relation to the client issue (it only discussed part of CBT client\'s issue, and included panic and anxiety without giving example from the case study, however, the case study did not have panic symptoms - so it is very irrelevant) - (It did not discussed clients specific hypothesis for EFT with example from the case provided)
2. each modality (CBT & EFT) specific interventions that you would employ in session with the case study - client, providing rationale for your answer (This has not given at all, it supposes give an intervention plan for counselling session that includes CBT and EFT techniques).
3. each modality specific case formulation for future consideration (attach each modality formulation to fill in according to the case study) and then discuss each in paragraphs.  (This has not provided at all).
4. limitations of each modality if used slowly and separately with the case study – discussing what aspects of the client situation do you believe would not be adequately addressed by each approach solely? (This only has been given but very briefly).
5. Based on your discussion, which modality would you choose to use with this client? 
Provide a clear rationale for your decision. (The answer was contradictive with the discussion of the limitation) 
Thank